TSTP Solution File: ITP123^1 by E---3.1.00

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.1.00
% Problem  : ITP123^1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v7.5.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sat May  4 08:07:02 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.22s 0.58s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.22s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :   14
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   31 (  13 unt;   8 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   43 (   6 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    7 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  195 (  17   ~;  11   |;   3   &; 158   @)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   5  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   11 (   7 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   1 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    8 (   8   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    9 (   7 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   33 (   0   ^  33   !;   0   ?;  33   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(decl_sort1,type,
    a: $tType ).

thf(decl_49,type,
    inf: a > a > a ).

thf(decl_50,type,
    less: a > a > $o ).

thf(decl_51,type,
    less_eq: a > a > $o ).

thf(decl_52,type,
    sup: a > a > a ).

thf(decl_53,type,
    x: a ).

thf(decl_54,type,
    y: a ).

thf(decl_55,type,
    z: a ).

thf(conj_4,conjecture,
    less_eq @ x @ ( sup @ ( inf @ y @ ( sup @ x @ z ) ) @ z ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.wEVOdgIyjT/E---3.1_13196.p',conj_4) ).

thf(fact_96_local_Ole__supE,axiom,
    ! [X4: a,X3: a,X1: a] :
      ( ( less_eq @ ( sup @ X4 @ X3 ) @ X1 )
     => ~ ( ( less_eq @ X4 @ X1 )
         => ~ ( less_eq @ X3 @ X1 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.wEVOdgIyjT/E---3.1_13196.p',fact_96_local_Ole__supE) ).

thf(fact_50_local_Odual__order_Oorder__iff__strict,axiom,
    ! [X3: a,X4: a] :
      ( ( less_eq @ X3 @ X4 )
    <=> ( ( less @ X3 @ X4 )
        | ( X4 = X3 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.wEVOdgIyjT/E---3.1_13196.p',fact_50_local_Odual__order_Oorder__iff__strict) ).

thf(fact_39_local_Osup_Ocommute,axiom,
    ! [X4: a,X3: a] :
      ( ( sup @ X4 @ X3 )
      = ( sup @ X3 @ X4 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.wEVOdgIyjT/E---3.1_13196.p',fact_39_local_Osup_Ocommute) ).

thf(conj_3,hypothesis,
    less @ ( sup @ x @ ( inf @ y @ z ) ) @ ( inf @ y @ ( sup @ x @ z ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.wEVOdgIyjT/E---3.1_13196.p',conj_3) ).

thf(fact_99_local_Ole__supI2,axiom,
    ! [X1: a,X3: a,X4: a] :
      ( ( less_eq @ X1 @ X3 )
     => ( less_eq @ X1 @ ( sup @ X4 @ X3 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.wEVOdgIyjT/E---3.1_13196.p',fact_99_local_Ole__supI2) ).

thf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( less_eq @ x @ ( sup @ ( inf @ y @ ( sup @ x @ z ) ) @ z ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conj_4])]) ).

thf(c_0_7,plain,
    ! [X4: a,X3: a,X1: a] :
      ( ( less_eq @ ( sup @ X4 @ X3 ) @ X1 )
     => ~ ( ( less_eq @ X4 @ X1 )
         => ~ ( less_eq @ X3 @ X1 ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[fact_96_local_Ole__supE]) ).

thf(c_0_8,plain,
    ! [X735: a,X736: a] :
      ( ( ~ ( less_eq @ X735 @ X736 )
        | ( less @ X735 @ X736 )
        | ( X736 = X735 ) )
      & ( ~ ( less @ X735 @ X736 )
        | ( less_eq @ X735 @ X736 ) )
      & ( ( X736 != X735 )
        | ( less_eq @ X735 @ X736 ) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fact_50_local_Odual__order_Oorder__iff__strict])])])]) ).

thf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( less_eq @ x @ ( sup @ ( inf @ y @ ( sup @ x @ z ) ) @ z ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

thf(c_0_10,plain,
    ! [X548: a,X549: a] :
      ( ( sup @ X548 @ X549 )
      = ( sup @ X549 @ X548 ) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[fact_39_local_Osup_Ocommute]) ).

thf(c_0_11,plain,
    ! [X563: a,X564: a,X565: a] :
      ( ( ( less_eq @ X563 @ X565 )
        | ~ ( less_eq @ ( sup @ X563 @ X564 ) @ X565 ) )
      & ( ( less_eq @ X564 @ X565 )
        | ~ ( less_eq @ ( sup @ X563 @ X564 ) @ X565 ) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])])])]) ).

thf(c_0_12,plain,
    ! [X1: a,X2: a] :
      ( ( less_eq @ X1 @ X2 )
      | ~ ( less @ X1 @ X2 ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

thf(c_0_13,hypothesis,
    less @ ( sup @ x @ ( inf @ y @ z ) ) @ ( inf @ y @ ( sup @ x @ z ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[conj_3]) ).

thf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( less_eq @ x @ ( sup @ ( inf @ y @ ( sup @ x @ z ) ) @ z ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

thf(c_0_15,plain,
    ! [X2: a,X1: a] :
      ( ( sup @ X1 @ X2 )
      = ( sup @ X2 @ X1 ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

thf(c_0_16,plain,
    ! [X572: a,X573: a,X574: a] :
      ( ~ ( less_eq @ X572 @ X573 )
      | ( less_eq @ X572 @ ( sup @ X574 @ X573 ) ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fact_99_local_Ole__supI2])])]) ).

thf(c_0_17,plain,
    ! [X1: a,X3: a,X2: a] :
      ( ( less_eq @ X1 @ X2 )
      | ~ ( less_eq @ ( sup @ X1 @ X3 ) @ X2 ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

thf(c_0_18,hypothesis,
    less_eq @ ( sup @ x @ ( inf @ y @ z ) ) @ ( inf @ y @ ( sup @ x @ z ) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).

thf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( less_eq @ x @ ( sup @ z @ ( inf @ y @ ( sup @ x @ z ) ) ) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).

thf(c_0_20,plain,
    ! [X1: a,X3: a,X2: a] :
      ( ( less_eq @ X1 @ ( sup @ X3 @ X2 ) )
      | ~ ( less_eq @ X1 @ X2 ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).

thf(c_0_21,hypothesis,
    less_eq @ x @ ( inf @ y @ ( sup @ x @ z ) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).

thf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]),c_0_21])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.15  % Problem    : ITP123^1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v7.5.0.
% 0.11/0.16  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.16/0.36  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.16/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/0.36  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.16/0.36  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.16/0.36  % DateTime   : Fri May  3 12:46:16 EDT 2024
% 0.16/0.37  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.22/0.52  Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.22/0.52  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.wEVOdgIyjT/E---3.1_13196.p
% 0.22/0.58  # Version: 3.1.0-ho
% 0.22/0.58  # Preprocessing class: HSLSSMSSSSSNHSA.
% 0.22/0.58  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/0.58  # Starting full_lambda_9 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.22/0.58  # Starting new_ho_11 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.58  # Starting sh2l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.58  # Starting new_bool_6 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.58  # full_lambda_9 with pid 13274 completed with status 0
% 0.22/0.58  # Result found by full_lambda_9
% 0.22/0.58  # Preprocessing class: HSLSSMSSSSSNHSA.
% 0.22/0.58  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/0.58  # Starting full_lambda_9 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.22/0.58  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,4,,3,20000,3.0,true)
% 0.22/0.58  # Search class: HGHSM-FSLM21-MHSFFSBN
% 0.22/0.58  # partial match(1): HGHSM-FSLM31-MHSFFSBN
% 0.22/0.58  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.22/0.58  # Starting almost_fo_1 with 811s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.58  # Starting full_lambda_9 with 151s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.58  # Starting post_as_ho3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.58  # Starting full_lambda_10 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.58  # Starting full_lambda_5 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.58  # full_lambda_10 with pid 13283 completed with status 0
% 0.22/0.58  # Result found by full_lambda_10
% 0.22/0.58  # Preprocessing class: HSLSSMSSSSSNHSA.
% 0.22/0.58  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/0.58  # Starting full_lambda_9 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.22/0.58  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,4,,3,20000,3.0,true)
% 0.22/0.58  # Search class: HGHSM-FSLM21-MHSFFSBN
% 0.22/0.58  # partial match(1): HGHSM-FSLM31-MHSFFSBN
% 0.22/0.58  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.22/0.58  # Starting almost_fo_1 with 811s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.58  # Starting full_lambda_9 with 151s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.58  # Starting post_as_ho3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.58  # Starting full_lambda_10 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.58  # Preprocessing time       : 0.004 s
% 0.22/0.58  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.22/0.58  
% 0.22/0.58  # Proof found!
% 0.22/0.58  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.22/0.58  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.22/0.58  # Parsed axioms                        : 290
% 0.22/0.58  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 102
% 0.22/0.58  # Initial clauses                      : 244
% 0.22/0.58  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 5
% 0.22/0.58  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 239
% 0.22/0.58  # Processed clauses                    : 316
% 0.22/0.58  # ...of these trivial                  : 13
% 0.22/0.58  # ...subsumed                          : 115
% 0.22/0.58  # ...remaining for further processing  : 188
% 0.22/0.58  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 21
% 0.22/0.58  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.22/0.58  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.22/0.58  # Backward-rewritten                   : 1
% 0.22/0.58  # Generated clauses                    : 276
% 0.22/0.58  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 156
% 0.22/0.58  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.22/0.58  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 2
% 0.22/0.58  # Paramodulations                      : 248
% 0.22/0.58  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.22/0.58  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.22/0.58  # Equation resolutions                 : 21
% 0.22/0.58  # Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.22/0.58  # Total rewrite steps                  : 114
% 0.22/0.58  # ...of those cached                   : 76
% 0.22/0.58  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.22/0.58  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.22/0.58  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.22/0.58  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.22/0.58  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.22/0.58  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.22/0.58  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.22/0.58  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.22/0.58  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.22/0.58  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.22/0.58  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.22/0.58  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.22/0.58  # Current number of processed clauses  : 60
% 0.22/0.58  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 25
% 0.22/0.58  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 2
% 0.22/0.58  #    Negative unit clauses             : 9
% 0.22/0.58  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 24
% 0.22/0.58  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 188
% 0.22/0.58  # ...number of literals in the above   : 394
% 0.22/0.58  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.22/0.58  # Current number of archived clauses   : 111
% 0.22/0.58  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 2627
% 0.22/0.58  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2250
% 0.22/0.58  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 100
% 0.22/0.58  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 40
% 0.22/0.58  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.22/0.58  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 115
% 0.22/0.58  # BW rewrite match successes           : 70
% 0.22/0.58  # Condensation attempts                : 316
% 0.22/0.58  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.22/0.58  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 24683
% 0.22/0.58  # Search garbage collected termcells   : 5065
% 0.22/0.58  
% 0.22/0.58  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.22/0.58  # User time                : 0.032 s
% 0.22/0.58  # System time              : 0.005 s
% 0.22/0.58  # Total time               : 0.037 s
% 0.22/0.58  # Maximum resident set size: 3148 pages
% 0.22/0.58  
% 0.22/0.58  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.22/0.58  # User time                : 0.115 s
% 0.22/0.58  # System time              : 0.018 s
% 0.22/0.58  # Total time               : 0.132 s
% 0.22/0.58  # Maximum resident set size: 2048 pages
% 0.22/0.58  % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.22/0.58  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------